This is your set-text on Plutarch.
Text in black is the Board's set text. Text in italics is the
Board's optional extras. Text in light blue I have added.
Mouse-over the emboldened words to read the
glosses.
Where words are
blue and underlined, there is also a hyperlink to
another site.
|
1. It is the life of Alexander the king, and of
Caesar, who overthrew Pompey, that I am writing in this
book, and the
multitude of the deeds to be treated is so great that I shall make no
other preface than to entreat my readers, in case I do not tell of all
the famous actions of these men, nor even speak exhaustively at all in
each particular case, but in epitome for the most part, not to complain.
For it is
not Histories, but Lives that I am writing; and in the most
illustrious deeds there is not always a manifestation of virtue or vice,
nay, a slight thing like a phrase or a jest often makes a greater
revelation of character than battles where thousands fall, or the
greatest armaments, or sieges of cities. Accordingly,
just as painters
get the likenesses in their portraits from the face and the expression
of the eyes, wherein the character shows itself, but make very little
account of the other parts of the body, so I must be permitted to devote
myself rather to the signs of the soul in men, and by means of these to
portray the life of each, leaving to others the description of their
great contests.
|
2. On his father’s side Alexander was
descended from
Heracles1 through
Caranus. On his mother’s he was a
descendent of Aeacus through
Neoptolemus. This is beyond doubt.
Philip
is said to have been initiated into the
mysteries at Samothrace with
Olympias, when he was still a
young man. He
fell in love with her when
she was an orphan and proposed marriage to her, after persuading her
brother, Arymbas, to consent.
The bride, on
the night before they slept
together in their bedroom, thought that there was a peal of thunder and
that a
thunderbolt fell on her womb. From the blow much fire sprung up,
and then it broke into flames that went everywhere, before being
extinguished. Philip, at a later time, after his marriage, dreamt that
he was putting a seal on his wife’s womb. In his opinion, the carving on
the seal had the image of a
lion.
When the other seers considered the
vision, they thought that Philip needed to keep
as close an eye as
possible on his marriage relations.
Aristander of Telmessus said that
the woman was pregnant, because a seal is not used on empty things, and
that she was carrying a child who was bold in spirit and had a lion-like
nature.
In addition, a snake was seen stretched out next to Olympias’
body as she slept. And
they say that this, more than anything else,
reduced Philip’s love and friendliness towards his wife, and that he no
longer slept with his wife, either because he feared some spells and
enchantments might be used against him by his wife or because he was
avoiding association with her, as she was the partner of a superior
being.
There is another story about these things. All the women in this place
were addicted to the Orphic rites and the orgies which surrounded
Dionysus from very ancient times. They were called Klodones and
Mimallones. They do many things which are the same as the Edonian women
and the Thracian women around Mount Haemus. From this it would seem that
the word
‘threskeuein’ came to refer to extravagant and superstitious
ceremonies. Olympias, rather more than other women, experienced
possession by divine spirits, and expressed divine inspiration in a
wilder fashion. She used to bring for those at the revels large, tame
serpents, which often would lift their heads out of ivy and mystic
baskets and, winding themselves around the wands and garlands of the
women, terrify the men.
|
3. After this vision, Philip sent
Chaeron
of Megalopolis to
Delphi. They say that he brought back an oracle from
the god which told him to sacrifice to
Ammon and honour this god very
highly. He would, however,
lose the eye which he had put to the chink in
the door when he had seen the god in the form of a snake sharing the bed
with his wife. Olympias, as
Eratosthenes says, sent Alexander on his
expedition, and told him about the secret surrounding his conception,
and told him to be proud of his birth. Others say that she rejected the
idea and said ‘Alexander must stop
slandering me to Hera.’
And so, Alexander
was born early in the month of Hecatombaeon, which the
Macedonians call Loüs, on the sixth day. This was the day when
the
temple of Ephesian Artemis was burnt. Hegesias the Magneian made a
statement about this which would have been able to extinguish the fire
with its
coldness. For he said that it was not surprising that the
temple of Artemis was burned down as the goddess was at work delivering
Alexander. All the
Magi who were at Ephesus at that time thought that
the disaster of the temple was a symptom of another disaster. They ran
about, beating their faces and shouting out that on that day a curse and
a great disaster for Asia had been born. Philip, on the other hand, had
just taken Potidaea. Three messages came to him at the same time. The
first, that the Illyrians had been conquered in a great battle by
Parmenio; the second that his race-horse had won a
victory at the
Olympic Games, and the third was about the birth of Alexander. He was
delighted by these things, as you would expect. The seers raised his
spirits even higher still when they said that a son born at the time of
three victories would be unconquerable.
|
4. The statues by
Lysippus are the best
likeness of Alexander’s appearance. Alexander himself thought that only
he was worthy to sculpt him. For those things which many of his
successors and friends later used to imitate – the
poise of his neck,
which was bent a little to the left and the wetness of his eyes – this
craftsman observed accurately. The painter
Apelles when painting him as
wielding a thunder-bolt, did not recall his complexion, but made him too
dark and swarthy. He was fair, they say. This fairness became a
ruddiness especially around his chest and face. His skin smelt very
pleasant and a
fragrance came from his mouth and all his flesh, so that
his clothes were filled with it. This I have read in the Memoirs of
Aristoxenus.
Perhaps the cause of this was the temperament of his body which was very
warm and
full of fire. For, in the opinion of
Theophrastus, the
fragrance comes about when the moist humours are in contact with heat.
For this reason, the dry and parched regions of the world produce the
most and best spices. For the sun dries the moisture that, like a
material of rottenness, fills their bodies. The warmth of his body, it
seems, made Alexander keen on drink and high-spirited
Whilst he was still a child, his self-restraint became clear: although
he was impetuous and violent in other respects, the pleasures of the
body moved him little, and he made contact with such things with great
moderation. Love of honour made him think seriously and in a lofty way,
beyond what might have been expected at his age. He did not like all
forms of fame and from any quarter, as Philip did. Philip had shown off
as a sophist with his cleverness in argument and had his chariot
victories at the Olympic Games engraved on coins. When, however, those
around him asked if he was willing to compete in the foot-race at the
Olympics – for he was a good runner – he said, ‘If kings are intending
to compete, yes.’ Alexander appears to have had
a negative attitude to
the whole class of athletes. Although he set up many competitions, not
only for tragic poets and flute-players and lyre-players, but also for
rhapsodes and for all types of hunting and fighting with staves, he did
not award prizes for boxing or the pancratium with any enthusiasm.
|
5. When ambassadors came
from the Persian king while Philip was away,
Alexander entertained them and spent time with them and impressed them with his friendliness. He
asked no childish or trivial questions but wanted to know about the
length of roads in Persia and what the journey from the coast into the
interior was like, and also what sort of warrior the king was and how
courageous and powerful the Persians were, with the result that they
were astonished and considered that Philip’s reputation for
cleverness
was as nothing compared to Alexander's eagerness to achieve great
things.
At any rate, whenever it was announced that Philip had taken a
famous city or achieved a notable victory in battle, Alexander was
not very happy to hear it* but said to his friends, “Boys, my father will
capture everything first. He will leave no great and brilliant deed for
me to achieve with your help.” For he did not seek pleasure or wealth
but courage and glory, and he thought that the more he received from his
father the less he would be able to achieve for himself. For this
reason, as he considered that the opportunities for success were being
used up by his father as he became more successful, he wanted to inherit
from him not money and luxury and pleasures, but rather contests and
wars and ambitions.
As you might expect, there were many nurses and tutors and
teachers appointed to look after him, and in charge of them all was Leonidas, a
man of austere character and a relative of Olympias. He accepted the
title of tutor as it was a noble and splendid occupation, but because of
his reputation and his family relationship he was called by others the
foster father and guide of Alexander. The man who took on the role and
title of tutor was Lysimachus, an Acarnanian by birth, not a refined
person, but because he called himself Phoenix, and Alexander
Achilles,
and Philip Peleus, he was loved and held the second place.
|
6
Philoneicus the
Thessalian brought
Boucephalas to
sell
to
Philip
for
13 talents. They all went down
to the plain to inspect the horse, and he appeared to be difficult and
completely unmanageable, not allowing anyone to ride him or responding
to the voice of any of Philip’s men, but rearing at all of them. Philip
was annoyed and ordered them to take the horse away as it was completely
wild and untrained. Alexander was there and said, “What a horse they are
losing when they cannot handle him through lack of skill and patience.”
At first Philip kept quiet, but where Alexander said the same thing many
times and was in
great distress, he said, “Do you find fault with your
elders because you know more than they do or are better able to handle a
horse?” Alexander replied, “I could certainly manage this horse better
than anyone else.” “And if you don't, what penalty should you pay for
your recklessness?” Straightaway Alexander said, “By Zeus, I will pay
the price of the horse.” This made everybody laugh, and then father and
son made an agreement about the penalty. At once Alexander ran up to the
horse and, taking the reins, turned him towards the sun, as he had
noticed that the horse was disturbed by seeing his own shadow falling in
front of him and dancing around. Then he calmed the horse a little by
doing this and stroked it, and when he saw that it was full of spirit
and energy he took off his cloak quietly, leapt up and seated himself
safely. Then
gently directing the bit with the reins without striking
the horse or tearing his mouth, Alexander held the horse back. When he
saw that the horse had stopped misbehaving and was eager for a run, he
spoke more boldly, kicked with his heels and gave the horse his head. At
first those with Philip were terrified and kept quiet. But when
Alexander came back proud and overjoyed, everyone there cried out and
his father is said to have cried with joy; when the boy had dismounted
he kissed him on his head and said, “My child, you must seek
a kingdom
equal to yourself; Macedonia is not big enough for you.”
|
7 Seeing that his son's
nature was resolute and that he did not like to be forced to do things
but was easily convinced by argument to do the right thing, Philip tried
rather to persuade him to order him. Because he did not entirely trust
the
direction and
education of the boy to the teachers of music and
other studies, as this was a matter of greater importance and as
Sophocles says, ‘a task requiring many
bits and rudders’, he sent for
the most
well-known philosopher, Aristotle, and paid him a fee which was
noble and appropriate. Some time before, Philip had destroyed the city
of Stageira, of which Aristotle was a citizen; he now repopulated it
again and brought back those of the citizens who were in exile or who
had been enslaved.
He gave them the sanctuary of the nymphs at Mieza as a school, where to
this day the locals point out the stone seats and shady walks of
Aristotle. Alexander
appears to have studied not only Aristotle's
ethical and political philosophy but also his secret and deeper
doctrines,
the so-called 'acroamatic' and 'epoptic' teachings which philosophers do not share with many people. For when
Alexander had just crossed into Asia and learnt that Aristotle had
published an account of these matters in
a book, he boldly wrote a
letter to him on behalf of philosophy, of which this is a copy:
"Alexander sends greetings to Aristotle. In publishing an account of
your private doctrines you have not acted properly;
what will
distinguish me from other men* if the private doctrines in which you
trained me will be available to everybody? I would prefer to be
distinguished from other people through my understanding of what is best
them through my power. Farewell."
|
8
In my opinion, Aristotle
was more responsible than anyone else for Alexander's interest in
healing. Not only was Alexander interested in theory but he also offered
help to friends when they were ill and he suggested remedies and changes
to the way they looked, as can be seen in his letters. He was naturally
interested in learning and was a keen reader. He considered and called
the Iliad a manual of military skill, and he took with him a copy
corrected by Aristotle which was called the Iliad of the casket; he
always kept it by him under his pillow together with a dagger, as
Onesicritus relates. When he could not get hold of other books on his
campaign into Persia, he ordered
Harpalus to send some. He received from
him the
books of Philistus together with many tragedies by Euripides and
Sophocles and Aeschylus, and also the dithyrambs of Telestus and
Philoxenus. He admired Aristotle from the beginning and loved him not
less, as he himself said, than his father, as he gained the gift of life
from his father, but from Aristotle he had learnt how to live nobly. In
later years he was more suspicious of Aristotle, not that he did him any
harm but his friendliness towards him was less warm, which was proof of
an estrangement between them. However his natural interest and
enthusiasm for philosophy which he demonstrated since childhood did not
leave him as he grew older as can be shown by his respect for Anaxarchus
and the 50 talents he gave
Xenocrates and his close association with
Dandamis and Calanus.
|
9 When Philip was making an
expedition against the people of Byzantium, Alexander, aged 16, was left
in charge of affairs in Macedonia and was keeper of
the king's seal.
When the Maedi revolted, he overcame them; after capturing their city he
drove out the barbarians and settled a mixed population there and
renamed the city
Alexandropolis. He was present at and took part in the
battle against the Greeks at
Chaeroneia, and it is said that he led the
charge against the
Sacred Band of the Thebans. Still even in my time an
ancient oak tree is pointed out as Alexander's tree next to the River
Cephisus where he pitched his tent at the time of the battle; the
general burying place of the Macedonians is close by.
Because of this, as one might expect, Philip was
very fond indeed of his
son and was even delighted when he heard the Macedonians calling
Alexander their king, and Philip their general. But the disturbances in
the Royal household, brought about by his marriages and his love
affairs, caused problems in his kingdom very similar to those in the
women's quarters of the palace and resulted in great quarrels between
Alexander and his father, which the bad temper of Olympias, an envious
and sullen woman, made still worse, as she encouraged the young man. The
most obvious quarrel was brought about by Attalus at the time of
Philip's marriage to
Cleopatra; Philip fell in love with a young girl,
even though he was
too old for her. Attalus was her uncle and when he
was drunk at a banquet he called on the Macedonians to ask the gods for
a legitimate inheritor of the kingdom from Philip and Cleopatra. Stung
by this remark Alexander said, "Do I appear to you to be a bastard, you
fool?" And he threw a cup at him. Philip drew his sword and stood up to
face Alexander, but fortunately for both of them because of his anger
and the wine he tripped and fell over. Alexander
insulted him and said,
"Look at this man, my friends, who is preparing to cross to Asia from
Europe, who comes a cropper crossing from one couch to another." After
this drunken brawl he took Olympias and put her in Epirus, while he
spent time amongst the Illyrians.
Meanwhile
Demaratus the Corinthian, who was a friend of the family and
prepared to speak his mind, went to Philip. After they greeted each
other, when Philip asked how the Greeks were agreeing with each other,
Demaratus replied, "It is certainly very appropriate, Philip, to be
worried about Greece, when you have filled your own house with such
strife and difficulties." Philip
realised he was right, and sent for
Alexander and brought him home with Demaratus’ help.
|
10 [Plutarch describes another conflict
between Philip and Alexander over the succession, as a result of which
Philip banished Alexander's
companions
Harpalus, Nearchus, Erigyius and Ptolemy,
then he adds:]
And so when Pausanias, who had been
outrageously dealt with at the
instance of Attalus and Cleopatra and could get no justice at Philip's
hands, slew Philip, most of the blame devolved upon
Olympias, on the
ground that she had added her exhortations to the young man's anger and
incited him to the deed; but a certain amount of accusation attached
itself to Alexander also. For it is said that when Pausanias, after the
outrage that he had suffered, met Alexander, and bewailed his fate,
Alexander recited to him the iambic verse of the Medeia: ‘
The giver of the bride, the bridegroom, and the bride.’
However, he did seek out the participants in the plot and
punished them,
and was angry with Olympias for her
savage treatment of Cleopatra during
his absence.
|
|
|