A Divided SocietyIII – Racism and the Ku Klux Klan |
|
ARGUMENT 1. A Time of Oppression [SHACKLE]
Source BIn the morning, a Black mother sent her children to a school for colored children only. Going to town, she sat at the back of the bus, in the seats for coloreds. She went to the post office for coloreds, visited the library for coloreds, and walked in a separate park. When she went shopping, she stood in line, so White women could go in front of her. Her husband went to work, but he was not the boss; that was a job for a White man. He used a separate rest room, and went to a separate toilet. John D Clare, The Black Peoples of America (2001)
|
Going DeeperThe links below will help you widen your knowledge: BBC Bitesize on Prejudice and intolerance against African Americans and their responses Historiography of the Second KKK
'Black' and 'White' - extensive resources on race in America 'Ku Klux Klan' - extensive resources on the KKK
Essay: To what extent did African Americans share in the Boom of the 1920s?
YouTube
Source AA lynching (1935) - note the children.
Consider:Racism had FIVE aspects in 1920s America [LEAFS]: Legal Discrimination
Identify examples of all five aspects in the way non-white races were treated in America in the 1920s. |
ARGUMENT 2. A Time of Flowering [RHINO]
|
Consider:In this section of the specification we have seen a society deeply divided: • Rich v Poor
The American historian William Leuchtenburg (Source C) believed that they all boiled down to the same issue – 'Modernity' (i.e. CHANGE). 1. Go back through the last seven webpages, and trace all the links you can find between the nine different issues (e.g. 6 and 9 are both fundamentally about racism). Do you agree with Leuchtenburg that they are all different sides of the same coin? Or were they separate, distinct problems? 2. And, if you agree that they are all linked, do you agree with Leuchtenburg that the connecting issue was Modernity – and if not, what? 3. Do you agree with Leuchtenburg that the fundamentalists lost and the modernists won? 4. Write an essay to sum up all you have learned so far: "How far was American society divided in the 1920s?"
|
Source CPolitical Fundamentalism The aftermath of the Scopes trial is symbolic of the fate of political fundamentalism in the 1920s. Immigration restriction, the Klan, prohibition, and Protestant fundamentalism all had in common a hostility to modernity and a desire to arrest change through coercion by statute. The anti-evolutionists won the Scopes trial; yet, in a more important sense, they were defeated, overwhelmed by the tide of cosmopolitanism. Such was the fate of each of the other movements. By the end of 1933, the Eighteenth Amendment had been repealed and the Klan was a dim memory. Immigration restriction, which apparently scored a complete triumph and certainly did win a major one, was frustrated when (since the law did not apply to the Western Hemisphere) Mexicans, French Canadians, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans, most of them ‘swarthy’ Catholics, streamed in. Ostensibly successful on every front, the political fundamentalists in the 1920s were making a last stand in a lost cause.. William Leuchtenburg, The Perils of Prosperity (2010)
|
|
|